A global agricultural intelligence platform that unifies every analysis, research paper, extension note and field trial into a single, explainable knowledge graph — continuously learning from every sample processed by Lambda.
Every question below is a live capability — semantic search across millions of soils, laboratory methods and agronomic decisions.
“”
“Across Australia, what recommendations do agronomists make on sandy soils with Olsen P of 18 mg/kg?”
“Which nutrient deficiencies are consistently reported in basalt-derived soils in tropical climates?”
Government archives, universities, laboratories, consultancies, farmer uploads, satellite products — every soil document, everywhere.
OCR and LLM extraction of samples, methods, values, recommendations, reasoning and limitations.
Location → Soil Type → Crop → Method → Nutrients → Recommendation → Observed Response.
Rainfall, temperature, elevation, geology, remote sensing and digital soil maps overlaid on every sample.
Explainable AI — not what to do, but why recommendations differ, and under which conditions each holds.
Where is sulphur deficient? Which laboratories use different critical values? Which recommendations produce measurable response?
Machine learning that forecasts deficiencies, toxicities, fertiliser response and expected yield — with confidence.
Every ICP, FTIR and spectral analysis strengthens the graph — a compounding, proprietary data advantage.

Reports are not stored as files — they are decomposed into entities, methods, measurements and outcomes. The result is a living Neo4j knowledge graph in which every new sample reinforces, contradicts or enriches what came before.
Every document carries country, region, GPS, climate, crop, sampling depth, laboratory, methodology, author, year and confidence — metadata that makes the corpus trustworthy.

Upload an ICP result. The platform identifies the soil, matches it against millions of comparable samples, and returns similar reports, likely deficiencies, carbon potential, nutrient density, regional trends, expected yield and benchmark farms — each backed by primary evidence.
One knowledge graph, many vantage points — each user sees the corpus through the lens of their practice.
Turn every ICP, FTIR and wet-chemistry run into a compounding data asset. Deliver richer client reports with contextual benchmarks.
Compare paddocks against similar soils regionally and globally. Justify every recommendation with primary evidence.
Query decades of historical surveys, trials and extension notes through a single semantic interface.
Track soil carbon trajectories, benchmark rehabilitation outcomes and evidence project claims with laboratory-grade provenance.
| Phase | Focus | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foundation | 2–3 mo | PostgreSQL / PostGIS, accounts, document storage, base map. |
| 2 | Document Ingestion | 2 mo | OCR, PDF parsing, metadata extraction, upload workflows. |
| 3 | AI Extraction | 3 mo | Structured extraction of data, recommendations, methods & reasoning. |
| 4 | Knowledge Graph | 2 mo | Neo4j linking soils, crops, methods, recommendations & outcomes. |
| 5 | Search & Analytics | 2 mo | Semantic search, geospatial queries, dashboards, filtering. |
| 6 | Recommendation Intelligence | 3 mo | Explainable AI, similarity, evidence ranking, confidence. |
| 7 | Predictive Models | 4–6 mo | ML for nutrient recommendations, yield response, deficiency prediction. |
| 8 | Commercial Platform | Ongoing | APIs, enterprise integrations, subscriptions, benchmarking. |

Early partnerships are opening for laboratories, agronomy practices, research institutions and carbon project developers. Contribute data, gain intelligence.